Exploring vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (ENIGMA): protocol for a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is common. However, the underlying pathophysiology remains largely unknown. Understanding the role of microvascular changes and finding markers that can predict PSCI, could be a first step towards better screening and management of PSCI. Capillary dysfunction is a pathological feature of cerebral small vessel disease and may play a role in the mechanisms underlying PSCI. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are secreted from cells and may act as disease biomarkers. We aim to investigate the role of capillary dysfunction in PSCI and the associations between EV characteristics and cognitive function one year after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA). METHODS: The ENIGMA study is a single-centre prospective clinical observational study conducted at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Consecutive patients with AIS and TIA are included and followed for one year with follow-up visits at three and 12 months. An MRI is performed at 24 h and 12 months follow-up. EV characteristics will be characterised from blood samples drawn at 24 h and three months follow-up. Cognitive function is assessed three and 12 months after AIS and TIA using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. DISCUSSION: Using novel imaging and molecular biological techniques the ENIGMA study will provide new knowledge about the vascular contributions to cognitive decline and dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is retrospectively registered as an ongoing observational study at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT06257823.

Urban-rural inequalities in IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A nationwide study.

INTRODUCTION: Rural residency has been associated with lower reperfusion treatment rates for acute ischemic stroke in many countries. We aimed to explore urban-rural differences in IV thrombolysis rates in a small country with universal health care, and short transport times to stroke units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this nationwide cohort study, adult ischemic stroke patients registered in the Danish Stroke Registry (DSR) between 2015 and 2020 were included. The exposure was defined by residence rurality. Data from the DSR, Statistics Denmark, and the Danish Health Data Authority, were linked on the individual level using the Civil Registration Number. Adjusted treatment rates were calculated by balancing baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weights. RESULTS: Among the included 56,175 patients, prehospital delays were shortest for patients residing in capital municipalities (median 4.7 h), and longest for large town residents (median 7.1 h). Large town residents were predominantly admitted directly to a comprehensive stroke center (98.5%), whereas 30.9% of capital residents were admitted to a hospital with no reperfusion therapy available (non-RT unit). Treatment rates were similar among all non-rural residents (18.5%-18.7%), but slightly lower among rural residents (17.2% [95% CI 16.5-17.8]). After adjusting for age, sex, immigrant status, and educational attainment, rural residents reached treatment rates comparable to capital and large town residents at 18.5% (95% CI 17.7-19.4). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: While treatment rates varied minimally by urban-rural residency, substantial differences in median prehospital delay and admission to non-RT units underscored marked urban-rural differences in potential obstacles to reperfusion therapies.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with ischemic stroke - A nationwide study.

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for ischemic stroke (IS) and associated with an adverse prognosis. Both stroke and diabetes care has evolved substantially during the last decade. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of T2D among IS patients along with time trends in the risk profile, use of glucose-lowering medications, quality-of-care and clinical outcomes, including stroke severity; length-of-stay; mortality, readmission and recurrent stroke in a large national cohort. METHODS: Registry-based cohort study including all IS events in Denmark from 2004 to 2020. IS with co-morbid T2D were compared to IS without diabetes while adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity, co-morbidity and socio-economic factors. RESULTS: The study included 169,262 IS events; 24,479 with co-morbid T2D. The prevalence of T2D in IS increased from 12.0% (2004-2006) to 17.0% (2019-2020). The adjusted absolute 30-day mortality risk in IS with T2D decreased from 9.9% (2004-2006) to 7.8% (2019-2020). The corresponding adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were 1.22 95% confidence interval (1.09-1.37) and 1.29 (1.11-1.50), respectively. The aRR of 365-day mortality was in 2004-2006: 1.20 (1.12-1.29) and in 2019-2020: 1.34 (1.22-1.47). The 30- and 365-day readmissions rates were also consistently higher in IS with T2D. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of T2D in IS increased over time. The 30- and 365-day mortality rates decreased over the time-period but were consistently higher in IS with co-morbid T2D. Readmissions were also higher in IS with T2D. This highlights an urgent need for strategies to further improve the prognosis in IS patients with co-morbid T2D.

Prevalence and impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients with acute ischaemic stroke: a nationwide register-based cohort study in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: An increased risk of stroke has been reported among patients with COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to investigate the nationwide prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among patients with acute ischaemic stroke and to study the impact on stroke severity, quality of care and mortality on an individual patient level. DESIGN: This was a nationwide register-based cohort study. SETTING: We used data from several Danish registers which were linked at an individual patient level using the unique civil registration number assigned to all Danish citizens. Patients were identified from the Danish Stroke Registry and information on SARS-CoV-2 infection status was collected from the Danish National COVID-19 Registry. Concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection was defined as a positive PCR test within 31 days prior to, and 1 day after, stroke admission. Information on comorbidity was collected from the Danish National Patient Registry and information on vital status was collected from the Danish Civil Registration System. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 11 502 patients admitted with acute ischaemic stroke from 10 March 2020 to 31 May 2021 were included in the study. RESULTS: Among the included patients, the majority (84.6%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2, but only 68 had a positive test. These patients were more prone to have atrial fibrillation and were more often treated with reperfusion therapy. They had a significantly increased risk of severe stroke (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.93, 95% CI: 1.22 to 3.04) and a significantly increased 30-day mortality risk (aRR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.19 to 4.39). There was no difference in the proportion of patients fulfilling relevant performance measures on quality of care. CONCLUSION: In this nationwide study, only 0.6% of patients with acute ischaemic stroke were tested positive for a concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patients with SARS-CoV-2 presented with more severe strokes.

Effect of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: A Post Hoc Subgroup Analysis From the RESIST Trial.

BACKGROUND: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a simple and noninvasive procedure that has proved to be safe and feasible in numerous smaller clinical trials. Mixed results have been found in recent large randomized controlled trials. This is a post hoc subgroup analysis of the RESIST trial (Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Patients With Acute Stroke), investigating the effect of RIC in different acute ischemic stroke etiologies, and whether an effect was modified by treatment adherence. METHODS: Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years), independent in activities of daily living, who had prehospital stroke symptoms with a duration of less than 4 hours. They were randomized to RIC or sham. The RIC treatment protocol consisted of 5 cycles with 5 minutes of cuff inflation alternating with 5 minutes with a deflated cuff. Acceptable treatment adherence was defined as when at least 80% of planned RIC cycles were received. The analysis was performed using the entire range (shift analysis) of the modified Rankin Scale (ordinal logistic regression). RESULTS: A total of 698 had acute ischemic stroke, 253 (36%) were women, and the median (interquartile range) age was 73 (63-80) years. Median (interquartile range) overall adherence to RIC/sham was 91% (68%-100%). In patients with a stroke due to cerebral small vessel disease, who were adherent to treatment, RIC was associated with improved functional outcome, and the odds ratio for a shift to a lower score on the modified Rankin Scale was 2.54 (1.03-6.25); P=0.042. The association remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders. No significant associations were found with other stroke etiologies, and the overall test for interaction was not statistically significant (χ2, 4.33, P=0.23). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute ischemic stroke due to cerebral small vessel disease, who maintained good treatment adherence, RIC was associated with improved functional outcomes at 90 days. These results should only serve as a hypothesis-generating for future trials. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03481777.

Stroke and Risk of Epilepsy: A Danish Nationwide Register-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is associated with a risk of epilepsy, but associations with age, sex, stroke type and severity, time trends, and mortality are uncertain. We studied the risk of epilepsy after stroke while accounting for sex, age, stroke types and severity, calendar time, and death. METHODS: This was a prospective nationwide register-based, matched cohort study of patients admitted with a validated first stroke in Denmark from April 1, 2004, to December 16, 2018, excluding those with prior epilepsy. Patients with stroke were matched 10:1 on age, sex, and calendar time with reference people without prior epilepsy or stroke. We estimated the cumulative incidence of an epilepsy diagnosis in the Danish National Patient Registry (International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision: G40) with death as a competing risk using competing risk regression and estimated adjusted hazard ratios by Cox regression models. RESULTS: We identified 101 034 patients with stroke (46.5% female; mean age, 70.4 years) who survived 14 days after stroke along with 1 010 333 matched reference people. Two years after the stroke, the cumulative incidence of epilepsy was 3.0% (95% CI, 2.9-3.2) after ischemic stroke and 8.6% (95% CI, 8.0-9.2) after intracerebral hemorrhage versus 0.7% (95% CI, 0.7-0.7) in the matched references. Compared with the reference population, the 2-year hazard ratio of epilepsy was 21.7 (95% CI, 20.3-23.2) after ischemic stroke and 61.3 (95% CI, 51.1-73.4) after intracerebral hemorrhage. The risk of epilepsy increased with stroke severity; the 2-year cumulative incidence of epilepsy was 10.5% (95% CI, 9.5-11.4) for very severe ischemic stroke and 13.1% (95% CI, 11.1-15.1) after very severe intracerebral hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study of patients with validated stroke, the absolute and relative risk estimates of poststroke epilepsy were lower compared with previous studies. Reasons for the lower risk estimates include accounting for the high mortality associated with stroke, which had a significant impact on risk especially for severe stroke.

Outcomes Following Adherence to a Randomized Stroke Trial Protocol.

This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial assesses whether compliance with the study protocol is associated with a better functional outcome even among participants in the sham-control group.

Transport Strategy in Patients With Suspected Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: TRIAGE-STROKE, a Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: When patients with acute ischemic stroke present with suspected large vessel occlusion in the catchment area of a primary stroke center (PSC), the benefit of direct transport to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) has been suggested. Equipoise remains between transport strategies and the best transport strategy is not well established. METHODS: We conducted a national investigator-driven, multicenter, randomized, assessor-blinded clinical trial. Patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) who were suspected for large vessel occlusion were randomized 1:1 to admission to the nearest PSC (prioritizing IVT) or direct CSC admission (prioritizing endovascular therapy). The primary outcome was functional improvement at day 90 for all patients with acute ischemic stroke, measured as shift towards a lower score on the modified Rankin Scale score. RESULTS: From September 2018 to May 2022, we enrolled 171 patients of whom 104 had acute ischemic stroke. The trial was halted before full recruitment. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Primary analysis of shift in modified Rankin Scale (ordinal logistic regression) revealed an odds ratio for functional improvement at day 90 of 1.42 (95% CI, 0.72-2.82, P=0.31). Onset to groin time for patients with large vessel occlusion was 35 minutes (P=0.007) shorter when patients were transported to a CSC first, whereas onset to needle (IVT) was 30 minutes (P=0.012) shorter when patients were transported to PSC first. IVT was administered in 67% of patients in the PSC group versus 78% in the CSC group and EVT was performed in 53% versus 63% of the patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This trial investigated the benefit of bypassing PSC. We included only IVT-eligible patients presenting <4 hours from onset and with suspected large vessel occlusion. Lack of power prevented the results from showing effect on functional outcome for patients going directly to CSC. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03542188.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Stroke: The RESIST Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite some promising preclinical and clinical data, it remains uncertain whether remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) with transient cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion is an effective treatment for acute stroke. Objective: To evaluate the effect of RIC when initiated in the prehospital setting and continued in the hospital on functional outcome in patients with acute stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted at 4 stroke centers in Denmark that included 1500 patients with prehospital stroke symptoms for less than 4 hours (enrolled March 16, 2018, to November 11, 2022; final follow-up, February 3, 2023). Intervention: The intervention was delivered using an inflatable cuff on 1 upper extremity (RIC cuff pressure, ≤200 mm Hg [n = 749] and sham cuff pressure, 20 mm Hg [n = 751]). Each treatment application consisted of 5 cycles of 5 minutes of cuff inflation followed by 5 minutes of cuff deflation. Treatment was started in the ambulance and repeated at least once in the hospital and then twice daily for 7 days among a subset of participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was improvement in functional outcome measured as a shift across the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days in the target population with a final diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Results: Among 1500 patients who were randomized (median age, 71 years; 591 women [41%]), 1433 (96%) completed the trial. Of these, 149 patients (10%) were diagnosed with transient ischemic attack and 382 (27%) with a stroke mimic. In the remaining 902 patients with a target diagnosis of stroke (737 [82%] with ischemic stroke and 165 [18%] with intracerebral hemorrhage), 436 underwent RIC and 466 sham treatment. The median mRS score at 90 days was 2 (IQR, 1-3) in the RIC group and 1 (IQR, 1-3) in the sham group. RIC treatment was not significantly associated with improved functional outcome at 90 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.20, P = .67; absolute difference in median mRS score, -1; -1.7 to -0.25). In all randomized patients, there were no significant differences in the number of serious adverse events: 169 patients (23.7%) in the RIC group with 1 or more serious adverse events vs 175 patients (24.3%) in the sham group (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.11; P = .68). Upper extremity pain during treatment and/or skin petechia occurred in 54 (7.2%) in the RIC group and 11 (1.5%) in the sham group. Conclusions and Relevance: RIC initiated in the prehospital setting and continued in the hospital did not significantly improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with acute stroke. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03481777.

Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is associated with lower risk of post-stroke dementia: A nationwide cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Dementia after stroke is common and is a great concern for patients and their caregivers. The objective was to investigate if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) was associated with lower risk of dementia after stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: When IVT was introduced in Denmark, not all eligible patients were treated due to restricted access. We conducted a nationwide register-based cohort study of all patients with AIS in Denmark from 2004 to 2011. IVT-treated patients were propensity score-matched with comparable non-treated patients. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause and vascular dementia 2, 5, and 10 years after stroke. RESULTS: Of the 5919 patients eligible for the study, 2305 IVT-treated patients were propensity score-matched with 2305 non-treated patients. Mean (SD) age was 66.6 (13.3) and 61.2% were male. Rate of all-cause dementia was lower for the IVT-treated 2 years (8.4/1000 person years (PY) vs 13.6/1000 PY, HR 0.63 (0.40-0.99)) and 5 years after stroke (7.3/1000 PY vs 11.4/1000 PY, HR 0.65 (0.46-0.91)). 10 years after stroke, the rates of all-cause dementia remained in favor of IVT (8.0/1000 PY vs 9.8/1000 PY, HR 0.83 (0.64-1.07)). IVT-treated had lower rates of vascular dementia 2 years (2.4/1000 PY vs 7.4/1000 PY, HR 0.33 (0.15-0.71)), 5 years (2.3/1000 PY vs 6.2/1000 PY, HR 0.38 (0.23-0.65)), and 10 years after stroke (3.0/1000 PY vs 5.4/1000 PY, HR 0.56 (0.38-0.81)). CONCLUSION: IVT treatment was associated with lower long-term risk of both vascular and all-cause dementia after AIS.

Inter-Rater Agreement on Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale (PASS) Between EMS Providers, Neurology Residents and Neurology Consultants.

Objective: To examine the agreement between emergency medical service (EMS) providers, neurology residents and neurology consultants, using the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) and the Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale (PASS). Methods: Patients with stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke mimic were included upon primary stroke admission or during rehabilitation. Patients were included from June 2018 to September 2019. Video recordings were made of patients being assessed with CPSS and PASS. The recordings were later presented to the healthcare professionals. To determine relative and absolute interrater reliability in terms of inter-rater agreement (IRA), we used generalisability theory. Group-level agreement was determined against a gold standard and presented as an area under the curve (AUC). The gold standard was a consensus agreement between two neurology consultants. Results: A total of 120 patient recordings were assessed by 30 EMS providers, two neurology residents and two neurology consultants. Using the CPSS and the PASS, a total of 1,800 assessments were completed by EMS providers, 240 by neurology residents and 240 by neurology consultants. The overall relative and absolute IRA for all items combined from the CPSS and PASS score was 0.84 (95% CI 0.80; 0.87) and 0.81 (95% CI 0.77; 0.85), respectively. Using the CPSS, the agreement on a group-level resulted in AUCs of 0.83 (95% CI 0.78; 0.88) for the EMS providers and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82; 0.90) for the neurology residents when compared with the gold standard. Using the PASS, the AUC was 0.82 (95% CI 0.77; 0.87) for the EMS providers and 0.88 (95% CI 0.84; 0.93) for the neurology residents. Conclusion: The high relative and absolute inter-rater agreement underpins a high robustness/generalisability of the two scales. A high agreement exists across individual raters and different groups of healthcare professionals supporting widespread applicability of the stroke scales.

Associations between emergency call stroke triage and pre-hospital delay, primary hospital admission, and acute reperfusion treatment among early comers with acute ischemic stroke.

To investigate the association between the Emergency Medical Service dispatcher's initial stroke triage and prehospital stroke management, primary admission to hospitals offering revascularization treatment, prehospital time delay, and rate of acute revascularization. In an observational cohort study, patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in Denmark (2017-2018) were included if the emergency call to the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center (EMDC) was made within three hours after symptom onset. Among 3546 included AIS patients, the EMS dispatcher identified 74.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1-76.0) correctly as stroke. EMS dispatcher stroke recognition was associated with a higher rate of primary admission to a hospital offering revascularization treatment (85.8 versus 74.5%); producing an adjusted risk difference (RD) of 11.1% (95% CI 7.8; 14.3) and a higher rate of revascularization treatment (49.6 versus 41.6%) with an adjusted RD of 8.4% (95% CI 4.6; 12.2). We adjusted for sex, age, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, and stroke severity. EMDC stroke recognition was associated with shorter prehospital delay. For all AIS patients, the adjusted difference was - 33.2 min (95% CI - 44.4; - 22.0). Among patients receiving acute revascularization treatment (n = 1687), the adjusted difference was -12.6 min (95% CI - 18.9; - 6.3). Stroke recognition by the EMS dispatcher was associated with a higher probability of primary admission to a hospital offering acute stroke treatment, and subsequently with a higher rate of acute revascularization treatment, and with an overall reduction in prehospital delay.

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Functional Outcome After Reperfusion-Treated Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate whether socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with functional outcome in patients with ischemic stroke treated with reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy). METHODS: This nationwide cohort study included reperfusion-treated patients with ischemic stroke ≥18 years registered in the Danish Stroke Registry between 2015 and 2018. Functional outcome was determined by the modified Rankin Scale score 90 days after stroke. SES was defined by educational attainment, family income, and employment status before stroke. SES data were available from Statistics Denmark and linked on the individual level with data from the Danish Stroke Registry. Uni- and multivariable ordinal logistic regression was performed for each socioeconomic parameter individually (education, income, and employment) to estimate the common odds ratios (cORs) for lower 90-day modified Rankin Scale scores. RESULTS: A total of 5666 patients were included. Mean age was 68.7 years (95% CI, 68.3-69.0), and 38.4% were female. Low SES was associated with lower odds for achieving lower 90-day modified Rankin Scale score: Low versus high education, cOR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.61-0.79), low versus high income, cOR, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.53-0.67), and unemployed versus employed, cOR, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.58-0.83). Inequalities were reduced after adjusting for age, sex, and immigrant status, except for unemployed versus employed patients, adjusted cOR, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54-0.80). No statistically significant differences remained after adjusting for potentially mediating variables (eg, stroke severity, prestroke modified Rankin Scale, and smoking). CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities were observed in functional outcome after reperfusion treated ischemic stroke. In particular, prestroke unemployment was negatively associated with good functional outcome. A more adverse prognostic profile among patients with low SES appeared to explain the majority of these inequalities.

Results of an international survey on the status of prehospital care.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital care including recognition of stroke symptoms by the public and professionals combined with an efficient and effective emergency medical service (EMS) is essential to increase access to effective acute stroke care. We undertook a survey to document the status of stroke prehospital care globally. METHODS: A survey was distributed via email to the World Stroke Organization (WSO) members. Information was sought on the current status of stroke prehospital delay globally, including (1) ambulance availability and whether payment for use is required, (2) ambulance response times and the proportion of patients arriving at hospital by ambulance, (3) the proportion of patients arriving within 3 h and more than 24 h after symptom, (4) whether stroke care training of paramedics, call handlers, and primary care staff, (5) availability of specialist centers, and (6) the proportion of patients taken to specialist centers. Respondents were also asked to identify the top three changes in prehospital care that would benefit their population. Data were analyzed descriptively at both country and continent level. RESULTS: Responses were received from 116 individuals in 43 countries, with a response rate of 4.7%. Most respondents (90%) reported access to ambulances, but 40% of respondents reported payment was required by the patient. Where an ambulance service was available (105 respondents) 37% of respondents reported that less than 50% of patients used an ambulance and 12% less than 20% of patients used an ambulance. Large variations in ambulance response times were reported both within and between countries. Most of the participating high-income countries (HIC) offered a service used by patients, but this was rarely the case for the low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Time to admission was often much longer in LMIC, and there was less access to stroke training for EMS and primary care staff. CONCLUSIONS: Significant deficiencies in stroke prehospital care exist globally especially in LMIC. In all countries, there are opportunities to improve the quality of the service in ways that would likely result in improved outcomes after acute stroke.

Quality in stroke care during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: A nationwide study.

Introduction: Evidence-based early stroke care as reflected by fulfillment of process performance measures, is strongly related to better patient outcomes after stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). Detailed data on the resilience of stroke care services during the COVID-19 pandemic are limited. We aimed to examine the quality of early stroke care at Danish hospitals during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and methods: We extracted data from Danish national health registries in five time periods (11 March, 2020-27 January, 2021) and compared these to a baseline pre-pandemic period (13 March, 2019-10 March, 2020). Quality of early stroke care was assessed as fulfilment of individual process performance measures and as a composite measure (opportunity-based score). Results: A total of 23,054 patients were admitted with stroke and 8153 with a TIA diagnosis in the entire period. On a national level, the opportunity-based score (95% confidence interval [CI]) at baseline for ischemic patients was 81.1% (80.8-81.4), for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) 85.5% (84.3-86.6), and for TIA 96.0% (95.3-96.1). An increase of 1.1% (0.1-2.2) and 1.5% (0.3-2.7) in the opportunity-based score was observed during the first national lockdown period for AIS and TIA followed by a decline of -1.3% (-2.2 to -0.4) in the gradual reopening phase for AIS indicators. We found a significant negative association between regional incidence rates and quality-of-care in ischemic stroke patients implying that quality decreases when admission rates increase. Conclusion: The quality of acute stroke/TIA care in Denmark remained high during the early phases of the pandemic and only minor fluctuations occurred.

Impact of prestroke physical activity and citalopram treatment on poststroke depressive symptoms: a secondary analysis of data from the TALOS randomised controlled trial in Denmark.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between prestroke physical activity and depressive symptoms up to 6 months after stroke and examine if citalopram treatment modified the association. DESIGN: A secondary analysis of data from the multicentre randomised controlled trial The Efficacy of Citalopram Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TALOS). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: TALOS was conducted at multiple stroke centres in Denmark from 2013 to 2016. It enrolled 642 non-depressed patients with first-ever acute ischaemic stroke. Patients were eligible for this study if a prestroke physical activity level was assessed by the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). INTERVENTIONS: All patients were randomised to citalopram or placebo for 6 months. OUTCOMES: Depressive symptoms 1 and 6 months after stroke measured on the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) ranging from 0 to 50. RESULTS: A total of 625 patients were included. Median (IQR) age was 69 (60-77) years, 410 (65.6%) were men, 309 (49.4 %) received citalopram and median (IQR) prestroke PASE score was 132.5 (76-197). Higher prestroke PASE quartile, compared with the lowest PASE quartile, was associated with fewer depressive symptoms both after 1 month (mean difference third quartile -2.3 (-4.2, -0.5), p=0.013, mean difference fourth quartile -2.4 (-4.3, -0.5), p=0.015) and 6 months after stroke (mean difference third quartile -3.3 (-5.5, -1.2), p=0.002, mean difference fourth quartile -2.8 (-5.2, -0.3), p=0.027). There was no interaction between citalopram treatment and prestroke PASE score on poststroke MDI scores (p=0.86). CONCLUSIONS: A higher prestroke physical activity level was associated with fewer depressive symptoms 1 and 6 months after stroke. Citalopram treatment did not seem to modify this association. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01937182 (ClinicalTrials.gov) and 2013-002253-30 (EUDRACT).

Processes of Care and Associated Factors in Patients With Stroke by Immigration Status.

BACKGROUND: Receiving evidence-based stroke care processes is associated with good clinical outcome. However, data on early stroke care among immigrants are scarce. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether guideline-recommended acute stroke care and associated factors differ between immigrants and Danish-born residents. DESIGN: Patients admitted with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke diagnoses (n=129,724) between 2005 and 2018 were identified from the Danish Stroke Registry. RESULTS: We included 123,928 Danish-born residents and 5796 immigrants with stroke. Compared with Danish-born residents, immigrants were less likely to be admitted to a stroke unit within 24 hours after stroke onset (81.5% vs. 83.9%, P <0.001) and had lower odds of early stroke care including dysphagia screening, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and nutritional assessment. After adjustment for age, sex, clinical, and sociodemographic factors, immigrants had lower odds of early stroke unit admission (odds ratio [OR]: 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), early dysphagia screening (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98), early physiotherapy (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and early occupational therapy (OR: 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98) than Danish-born residents. Small absolute differences in overall quality of stroke care were found when comparing immigrants and Danish-born residents. Significant factors associated with greater likelihood of stroke care included high income, high education, and cohabitation. CONCLUSIONS: Immigrants had lower chances of early stroke unit admission and received fewer individual early stroke care processes such as dysphagia screening, physiotherapy and occupational therapy than Danish-born residents. However, the absolute disparities were in general minor and largely influenced by socioeconomic status and cohabitation.

Treatment Delays and Chance of Reperfusion Therapy in Patients with Acute Stroke: A Danish Nationwide Study.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to determine the treatment delay for ischemic stroke patients in Denmark. METHODS: A nationwide register-based study on acute ischemic stroke patients admitted through emergency medical services. Treatment delay comprised patient, prehospital, and in-hospital delay. Analyses were stratified according to length of prehospital delay (<3 vs. ≥3 h). RESULTS: A total of 5,356 ischemic stroke episodes were included. The median onset-to-door time was 187 min, and 2,405 (43%) arrived at the stroke unit within 3 h. Overall, the median patient delay was 115 min. For early arrival (n = 2,280), patient delay was 27 min compared to 437 min for late arrivals (n = 2,448). Median prehospital delay varied by 9 min between early- and late-arriving patients. Approximately 48% of the early-arriving patients compared to 9% of the late-arriving patients received i.v. thrombolysis. For thrombectomy, the numbers were 10% and 3%, respectively. This corresponded to an unadjusted relative risk (RR) of 0.18 (95% CI: 0.16-0.21) and adjusted (age, sex, cohabitation status, and stroke severity) RR of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.18-0.23) for i.v. thrombolysis when comparing patients arriving later than 3 h with patients arriving earlier. For thrombectomy, the unadjusted and adjusted RRs were 0.30 (95% CI: 0.23-0.39) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.31-0.52), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patient delay remains the most important barrier for use of reperfusion therapy among acute ischemic stroke patients calling 1-1-2, whereas system delay seems independent of patient delay.

Impact of Stroke History on the Risk of Recurrent Hip Fracture or Major Osteoporotic Fractures among Patients with Incident Hip Fracture: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Considerable uncertainty prevails regarding risk factors for recurrent fracture among older patients with hip fracture. We aimed to investigate the relationship between prefracture stroke history, baseline mobility, and the risk of recurrent hip fracture. This cohort study was based on the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry, 2011-2018 (n = 48,230). We estimated cumulative incidence (competing risk of death) of recurrent hip fracture and major osteoporotic fractures within 1 and 2 years comparing patients with/without prefracture stroke history. Analyses were performed overall and stratified on baseline mobility status (good mobility: Cumulated Ambulation Score ≥ 5 versus poor mobility: Cumulated Ambulation Score < 5). Using Cox regression, adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained. The 1-year cumulative incidence was 4.6% (95% CI: 3.9-5.4) among patients with stroke history and 4.3% (95% CI: 4.1-4.5) among patients without stroke history. For patients with good mobility, the cumulative incidence of recurrent hip fracture was 5.8% (95% CI: 4.3-7.5) versus 3.7% (95% CI: 3.4-4.0) for patients with versus without stroke history. Corresponding numbers for patients with poor mobility were 4.4% (95% CI: 3.6-5.5) and 5.0% (95% CI: 4.7-5.3). Stroke history was associated with an adjusted HR of 1.55 (95% CI: 1.15-2.10) for recurrent fracture among patients with good mobility. In contrast, no association was observed among patients with poor mobility (adjusted HR 0.88 [95% CI: 0.70-1.10]). The associations were attenuated after 2 years of follow-up and for major osteoporotic fractures. In conclusion, stroke history was associated with slightly higher risk of recurrent fracture among patients with first-time hip fracture in the overall analysis, although the CI included a null result. The association was modified by baseline mobility: Patients with stroke history and good mobility had a markedly higher risk, whereas patients with stroke and poor mobility did not. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).